Liquid Space Theory – An Alternate Resolution to String Theory


There I was, placing a floating object in the water. On top of it was a dowel and 4 stacked ring magnets with a positive polarity facing upward. I measured the depth of the water and confirmed it within a millimeter. Next, I added 4 stacked ring magnets, sliding them on top of the dowel with their positive polarity facing downward. And, much to my chagrin, the level of the water rose. This meant that even though I could freely pass any object in between the two sets of magnets, one resting on the flotation device and the other being levitated in air – that somehow, the mass weight of the floating magnets was being distributed downward onto the flotation device causing it to weigh more and thus, displacing more water. Even though I could interrupt the lines of force, they simply bent around one another, shifting the weight on the flotation device, and preserving the constant of mass and gravity.


A long search online has resulted in multitudes of conflicting answers and as many people frustrated as I am. It’s FLOATING – how does its mass get shared with the object supporting it based on lines of moving magnetic forces? (Of course, I’ve been informed just how stupid I am not to simply “get it” … so I guess part of science is simply accepting the answer: because it does!). Yet, I have been working on an alternate to string theory for more than 10 years and finally – with this experiment and all the frustration, I think I understand and can more concisely quantify why this happens. So, let’s start by asking a few questions, shall we?

Why, in space, with no gravity, if you were to push on the space station, even though you may cause an incremental (negligible) amount of displacement, would you be pushed back? Well, on Earth, you might understand that to mean that the Space Station weighs more than you do and there’s a downward gravitational force that is applying a counter-force via friction of … invisible air particles (<=again … you just have to “accept it because gravitons are not yet proven or understood, just observed), that is greater than you pushing. But, in space, there is no gravity. Yet, somehow, the conservation of mass applies evenly in space as it does on Earth. And, it’s a very hollow and empty definition with very little to explain it (you can click on the link I provided on the term and read it for yourself).

The Universe requires constants! Um … based on what?

There is math to prove it! Again … based on a conformity of mathematical equations designed to forcibly validate a principal without allowing for possible alternates, which, in an age where quantum mechanics defies the standard laws of physics, that’s sort of … well … dumb?


Why is the law of momentum regarding an object in motion staying in motion unless otherwise acted upon by another object, a law? What is it based on? Has anyone ever been able to move an object for infinity? Because, unless that’s been tested, it’s NOT a law (or at least, it shouldn’t be). It may be a pretty sound argument with constant demonstrative evidence to make it a consistent theory within a given set of parameters, but it is by no means, a law. Let’s look at it this way: What is wind? Go ahead … look it up. With everything I’ve read … and we are talking thousands of articles, wind is wind because … well … wind is wind. No, really … that’s it. Some “force” applies pressure to gases that have condensed for some reason based on another “force”, and then becomes a “force” of its own giving “force” to … oh … well… cr*p. I can’t even keep that going. It’s far too stupid of an explanation.

Why are there “G-Forces” in space? Well … according to the definition of a “G-Force”, it has to do with gravity and vector forces acting against an object. Makes sense, right? But, in space, there is no (or negligible amounts of) gravity. So, going in a straight line is fine, right? (<=No, apparently, that has limitations??) BUT, if you TURN around while going at high rates of acceleration, there are G-Forces! Wait? WHAT? Did acceleration create gravity? Aren’t the laws of momentum and opposing forces based on the need to have a vector opposing force in the first place (which is counter-intuitive when there’s no gravity)? How do I even obtain momentum or g-forces when there is no gravity or force to otherwise apply it? (No – really … describe the molecular process of physical interactions between particles that creates force to describe G-forces in space … not just using words like “centripetal force”, but actually giving the physical interactive frictional state of forward moving molecules and … what?). Isn’t it possible, that in a complete vacuum devoid of all external possible forces, that firing my rocket once would NOT keep me going forward, but instead, I would eventually run out? Well … it is possible. A recent study of a satellite veering off course was blamed on potential solar winds extending out into the depths of space where there should have been none. But … was it really solar winds?


All of that said … we must first put aside the awesome, headache-inducing mathematical formulas that prove in a <1% range of possibility that there is a constant when observed under a singular perception of experience that the assumptions of force are set in stone (which is what we have to do to even look at quantum physics). Next, we must set aside an explanation that things happen simply because they do. The evidence of absence is NOT the absence of evidence and is NOT a sound, theoretical definition. It hasn’t worked so far (thus, we haven’t achieved warp speed, Captain!). In comes string theory: a highly convoluted and confusing premise whereby everything is connected by a billion trillion quadzillion gazillion miles of subatomic particles all interacting in a flat dimension of space based on 9 dimensions (or something to that effect … you can read it for yourself)! Whew! What? Think I’m being silly … HAHAHAHAHAHAHA …. no … wait, ahem … HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That IS string theory.

Let’s try something new, shall we? A small idea outside of the box … you know … where the rest of the Universe lives.


Liquid Space.

(insert cool, epic sounds)

This may not be a ‘good’ name, but as this theory relates the motion and behavior of particles to the same type of actions observed mainly in water; for now, it works. Here’s how this theory goes:

We live in liquid space. There are countless … literally countless … numbers of Single Phase Charged (“SPeC”) Particles. These tiny buggers are smaller than our current systems of measurement. They are singular charges … basically … the fundamental form of energy with a positive and a negative. They are not empty or hollow as they are the smallest form of energy. And, they occur in one of two states: positive charge, or negative charge, and their charge has a spherical nature such that Spec particles are perfectly balanced with one another in their normal state.


The lines in Figure 1 are representative of the teenie, tiny bonds that Spec particles share. It is the strongest bond in the universe, is infinitesimally small, and keeps Spec particles all aligned, filling all space (throughout the universe), like a great, big ocean. The Spec particles are arranged in such a manner that they remain in perfect balance at all times:


Thus, in this interconnected weave of Spec particles, it is not so different from string theory insomuch as everything is connected (and by tiny spaces … very tiny). But, they are not like “guitar” strings as proposed in string theory. Any energy (and force, momentum, electricity, chemistry, blah, blah, blah, is a form of energy if it pushes or pulls on even a single Spec particle) applied to one Spec particle is transferred through to the Spec particle, and the next, and the next, depending on how strong the initial force was to begin with. This is extremely rapid due to the their size and the even smaller gap they share. Of course, Spec Particles are small … like REALLY small:


By having such a tiny size, Spec particles are everywhere and part of everything. They existing anywhere there is open space in between, around, under, over, inside and out. They define the shape of all things in the universe, but when pushed to their maximum length of separation, they will simply pass through that charge to the other side, and this is how they are part of “everything”. Here’s an example of the liquid ocean with an object passing through:


While Spec particles exist around and inside of, they move with everything in the universe thus maintaining the constant state and shape. There is also a limit to both how far Spec particles can be condensed, and how far they can be pulled apart. This is the cause for the wavelike pattern of energy:


In fact, this is one of the reasons that we cannot measure Spec particles in any traditional sense. The wavelike patterns of energy used to measure other energy simply travels along with Spec particles, moving as they do. The only real way to measure them would be based on their absence (basically, the force that keeps larger particles physically separated). This gives rise to the causality of atomic and nuclear energy. Pulling apart atoms or splitting their nuclei is not just a matter of a single separation of strongly interconnected energies, you also risk splitting the bond of each Spec particle which creates a compounding force of energy that exponentially builds.

As previously mentioned, Spec particles are the cause for all shape of matter in the Universe:


In figure 6, we see that the gap between neutrons and Spec particles is different than the gap between protons, neutrons, and Specs (if you look super close at the illustration). The difference in force carries through to the other interconnected Spec particles and thus, eventually limits the number of electrons around the core of an atom (giving a definition to the fundamental shape of all matter). Moving away from the nucleus, only the electrons have an effect on the Specs and thus, the outer electron bands are able to hold more electrons.

This is another important explanation regarding the behavior of electrons. Sure, there is a mathematical formula that is uniquely designed to prove that electrons jump to empty spaces … but it is not a validator – it only verifies that this happens and can be measured. Another explanation often given about the nature of electrons in an atomic core is the principal of equal balance in the universe. Yet, there are many examples, on the same theoretical level of conjecture, that show balance does not exist everywhere. And, wanting to refrain from getting into all of that right here … I’ll leave it to you to look that up if you’re interested. Meanwhile, liquid space offers a reasonable explanation of the behavior of electrons, atoms, and subsequently, all forms of matter.

Next, let’s take a look at a tear in the fabric of space … or otherwise, a tear in the incredibly powerful bond of liquid space:


Under a focused concentration of energy (like the particle collisions that occur at CERN), the bond between Specs can be torn. As shown in Figure 7, the remaining specs (although in a 3D space), are left loose, pinging around like a 3D pinball machine. Here’s what happens next:


The sheer nature of positive and negative particles (which, I’m aware is not well explained in here either and I apologize as it is one of those assumptions, regarding polarity and attraction, that we’ll have to maintain for now), causes them to repair itself. As they move about radically in the free space created, they begin shifting away from like poles and toward opposite poles. This process continues until there’s a virtual “whirlpool” filling the void where they were torn apart. As the loose Spec particles reach an oppositely charged particle and begin to align with the surrounding Spec particles, the bonds are re-established and the tear is repaired (basically, when loose specs get surrounded – they have nowhere to go and rapidly loose their motion and quickly realign). I would argue that this is what CERN is seeing when they witness the “micro” black holes. Along with the Spec particles, other matter is also drawn into the swirling behavior until the tear is repaired (which can occur at the smallest fractions of measurable time), and then let loose. So, I would also argue, that when CERN claims to see new materials formed by new bonds made at the subatomic level, what they are seeing is a haphazardness caused by a lack of structured Spec particles to properly balance that formation in a natural way.

The existence of liquid space also provides an explanation for photon energy:


Under normal conditions, Spec particles exist around and inside of an electron shell filling up any empty space they can and giving shape to the electron. Spec particles are still interconnected even through the electron shell. Small waves of energy traveling through the external Spec particles, caused by some other force, that reach the electron, causes excitation:


In Figure 10, starting at drawing “A”, waves of energy condense against the electron causing it to literally move (eventually in a vibrating or “excited” state). This puts a strain on the bonds between the external and internal Spec particles. In “B”, as the vibrating wave continues back and forth (now almost a self-perpetuating state between the electron an surrounding Spec particles), the bonds between the external and internal Spec particles begin to break. Energy is released with the breaking of each bond having a different and unique wavelength, causing a rapid increase in energy within the electron and further exciting its motion. The Spec particles within the electron “spring” away from the outer shell and toward the center as the external bonds are broken but internal bonds remain. The energy of the Spec particles within the center begin to change the frequency of their wavelength (the motion initially given to them from the externally interconnected Spec particles that started this whole process), as they no longer move in synchronization with the Spec particles outside of the electron. In “C”, there is a micro-tear in the Spec particle field. The continuous vibration and alternating frequencies overcame the Spec particle bonds between the external and internal particles. The specs within the center have remained attached to one another and, now, with a different wavelength than those moving around it, “break free” / come loose as the electron continues its journey around the electron band. This is an excellent explanation of why photons are created as part of the excited state of electrons.

In Figure 10, part “C”, not all of the Spec particles have broken from their surrounding neighbors. So, as the loose particles begin to swirl around looking for a neighbor to adhere to (as per Figure 8), they also pull on the remaining Spec particles within the electron, creating a micro-whirlpool. As the bonds between the external/internal Spec particles is maxed, more Spec particles are drawn into the electron and new connections are made, naturally repairing itself. It’s this process of tugging the surrounding Spec particles inward that overcomes the energy wave in the surrounding Spec particles that sent the electron into an excited state in the first place and brings it back to a state of rest (as restful as electrons can get!!). Those particles which have broken off are so densely packed and continuing to emit energy, breaking and re-establishing bonds, that they make up photons of light. It’s this reason that photons appear to be empty. Under this theory, photons are merely renegade Spec particles moving to their own wavelength!


Another important phenomenon of the Spec tear principal is the formation of black holes and stars. When an explosion is large enough, it creates a “void” in the universe. When this void occurs, normal energy, including photons, cannot travel in wave patterns and thus, stop emitting energy in a way that appears as light. Now, one of two things happens:


1. As noted in Figure 8, the outer edges of the swirling whirlpool will only stretch so far as the Spec force connecting them has a limited range and is extremely powerful. When the explosive energy that tears them apart is strong enough, it can continue to tear on the surrounding spec particles and loosen them, too. Eventually, the specs will continue to spread apart and not repair the tear because the Specs at the center suddenly start “balling” up (like they did in Figure 10 with the electron), making a rapid, tight connection. Rather than following the traditional form of energy, they are transformed into a different type of energy (and given the strength they already have), become a form of “supercharged gravity”. As that center ball gains in mass and strength, it further pushes away the unaffected Spec particles and creates the “void”. There are spec particles that break loose and constantly float around inside of it (each time contributing more and more energy), but are eventually thrust out of the void/black hole, or are sucked back into the center, further strengthening the super-gravitational force. As matter is drawn into the void, without a Spec particle arrangement, it appears as though all light is lost and the matter loses its form. I know this is probably confusing and simplistic – but it is difficult to explain in a small space (no pun intended)!

2. Alternatively, when there is an explosion and the Spec wave is repairing itself, particles can get trapped in the swirl and drawn toward the center. When this happens, they collide with an explosive force. This causes more tears in the Spec fields and the energy is rapidly/exponentially compounded. I’ve argued that stars are born out of nebulas / gas fields, as it would be the surrounding gases that are ignited and then further drawn in toward the center of the self-repairing whirlpool. As this process occurs, the energy within Spec particles builds and the distance between the particles grows and they begin moving at extreme velocities. This builds up heat energy which pulls Spec particles further apart and becomes a self perpetuating system that leads to the birth of a star. Grouped spec particles are also rapidly thrown out as photons of light (as per figure 10). As the energy is released and Spec photons are released, they create massive waves extending out from the core of the star. These longer bonds allow the spherical shape of the Spec fields to become elongated, so much so, until they actually become more of a “flat” disc like shaped field like those observed in planetary systems. The massive amounts of energy continuously released by the sun continue to transfer their energy into the Spec field as they pass through, maintaining the shape and force throughout the planetary system. Again, I apologize as I know this is probably confusing and simplistic – but the theory requires a lot more space to fill and this is only a blog (of which no one tends to read anyway … lol)!


This brings us back to why electrons are drawn into the core of an atom in the first place. As Spec particles can pass through the magnetic barrier of any particle (as the specs have a finite amount of stretch between them), the smaller the particle (atomic nuclei, subatomic particles, etc.), the more condensed the Spec field and the tighter the pull on surrounding Specs. So, as they pull in toward the core of an atom, the electrons (as light and small as they are), are pulled in by the surrounding Spec field. When electrons are exposed to empty slots on the atomic band, it is the force of the condensed Spec particles “rushing in” to fill a space (like water), that gives each electron a “push” toward the open space (aka the electron is just being pushed around by the active Spec particles).

Finally, another important aspect to the Liquid Space theory is that it gives support to momentum, acceleration, and mass in a weightless environment, so that even the effects of the Spec particles are as strong as those of gravity. As the Spec particles are in a colder environment and have a longer stretch of unaffected areas, they have somewhat of a superconducting effect. By this I mean that their bonds are just a little tighter and more stable as the particles remain magnetically aligned. And, at their size, a small nudge can quickly build into a much larger one. So, as an astronaut, pushing on a very large ship will have little effect because its mass must force a lot of Spec particles to move with it and the electromagnetic force creates friction – even in space. And, while accelerating in a space ship and trying to turn on a dime, there will be a vertex counter force because the mass wave disturbance through the Spec field was directional and trying to turn against that is like trying to turn against an ocean wave. The reason that the invisible forces of magnets transfer weight from one to the other is because Spec particles are giving shape and energy to those fields and it’s not empty space – anymore than the space in ocean waters is empty … all space is filled with Spec particles. The downward force ot the the empty space and whatever object I put in its way was actually due to liquid space as it filled those empty magnetic field and passed straight through the object I placed in the way.

Liquid space is the only sufficient explanation as to why an object in motion would stay in motion … or wouldn’t. In fact, unless an object has potential energy that can translate to the Spec particles around it, thus transferring the wavelike pattern into the Spec fields upon which it would continue to ride, the Spec particles would act as components of friction and bring the object to a standstill. Similarly, this can be tested by observing the movement of celestial objects and even subatomic particles. They are riding in a Spec wave that has been induced by some other source. A counter to this is the nature of photons. Due to their unique nature (whereby they ARE emitting energy as they travel … the kind of energy we see as light), they transmit just enough energy into the Spec field that it propagates an ongoing wave that can carry the light for … ever? Thus, the Liquid Space Theory literally rewrites Newton’s first law of motion. Newton’s first law says: An object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. The rewrite would be:

An object will remain at rest, floating within 3-Dimensional liquid space or in uniform motion when imparting energy to liquid space to create a wave of energy upon which to travel, or in uniform motion when being propelled by the forces within liquid space, or in uniform motion when carrying enough force to continue to affect the liquid space around it to maintain a directional wave structure, unless there is a counter force in liquid space greater than the force of the object.

And, that folks (regardless of how complex it sounds or amateurish it may be), is why light can continue on its journey, even when bent around large bodies of gravity (or heat), and not be stopped or diminished and why we can see light escaping from the sun and not being sucked back into it by gravity!

I know I balk at science constantly for stupid, un-prove-able, crazy theories. This theory is no different, or less crazy, or … potentially as of yet … less difficult to prove. However, I’ve had this theory for a long time and even though it will probably never be read by any “super” scientist and I will never be the next Albert Einstein or Newton, it is the most important step in understanding how the universe works. String theory and the “god” particle are neat – but inherently flawed by over-thinking. Their origins lie in observation … not math. Their organization and design is based on simple, scientific precepts and an understanding upon which we can draw some pretty sound, preliminary conclusions. Yet, the current state of those theories (like string theory), are far too convoluted and costing a lot of taxpayer dollars at universities to prove or disprove. The nature of black holes is still too far out of human reach that theoretical physicists are literally able to throw darts in the dark at it and make anything stick. So, I take the time to present to you the theory of liquid space (or, the Kennedy Conjecture of All Principal Matter). It’s simple. It’s actually easy to observe. And, there may be some simpler methods to test for it (not to mention how many unanswered questions it solves as a single theory!).

So … there you go. Yeah, there’s a LOT more to this theory, but I think for now, you have the basics. Yes, it’s long … but it’s a pretty complex task bringing the universe together and solving all the mysteries, you know?

Thanks for reading, Space Cowboy!

Space …. the final frontier ...” (you know who ...)


4 thoughts on “Liquid Space Theory – An Alternate Resolution to String Theory

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s